Published Wednesday, September 04, 2013 @ 1:34 PM EDT
Sep042013
"In the months after 9/11, so many people chose to drive instead of fly
that the resulting deaths dwarfed the deaths from the terrorist attack
itself, because cars are much more dangerous than airplanes." Bruce
Schneier, "Our Newfound Fear of Risk"
In light of the Edward Snowden/NSA scandal, CBS' science fiction series Person
of Interest now more closely resembles a reality show:
While not quite as memorable as "Space... the final frontier," the
series' opening voice over provides a pretty good summary of the premise:
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system: a machine
that spies on you every hour of every day. I designed the machine to
detect acts of terror, but it sees everything... violent crimes
involving ordinary people. The government considers these people
'irrelevant'. We don't. Hunted by the authorities, we work in secret.
You'll never find us, but victim or perpetrator, if your number's up...
we'll find you".
John Reese (Jim Caviezel), a former Green Beret and CIA field officer,
is living as a derelict in New York City after the death of the woman he
loves, and is presumed dead. He is approached by Harold Finch (Michael
Emerson), a reclusive billionaire computer genius who is living under an
assumed identity. Finch explains that after September 11, 2001, he built
a computer system for the government that uses information gleaned from
omnipresent surveillance to predict future terrorist attacks. However,
Finch discovered that the computer was predicting ordinary crimes as
well. The government is not interested in these results, but Finch is
determined to stop the predicted crimes. He hires Reese to conduct
surveillance and intervene as needed, using his repertoire of skills
gained in the military and the CIA. Through a back door built into the
system, Finch receives the Social Security number of someone who will be
involved in an imminent crime, at which point he contacts Reese. Without
knowing what the crime will be, when it will occur, or even if the
person they were alerted to is a victim or perpetrator, Reese and Finch
must try to stop the crime from occurring.
They are helped by NYPD Detectives Lionel Fusco (Kevin Chapman), a
corrupt officer whom Reese coerces into helping them, and Joss Carter
(Taraji P. Henson), who in early episodes investigates Reese for his
vigilante activities. Although Reese arranges for Carter and Fusco to be
partners in the NYPD early in the first season, neither learns that the
other is also working with Finch and Reese until season two.
Periodically, the team also enlists the aid of Zoe Morgan (Paige Turco),
a professional "fixer" who applies her skills to particularly difficult
tasks. The series features several subplots. One significant story arc
involves "HR", an organization of corrupt NYPD officers in league with
budding mob boss Carl Elias (Enrico Colantoni); in the course of this
arc Fusco is forced to go undercover. Another important storyline
revolves around Root (Amy Acker), a psychopathic female hacker who is
determined to gain access to the Machine; she asserts the device is
actually God, and that she has been summoned by "her."
Ah, The Machine...
The Machine is a mass surveillance computer system programmed to monitor
and analyze data from surveillance cameras, electronic communications,
and audio input throughout the world. From this data, the Machine
accurately predicts violent acts. Under control of the U.S. Government,
its stated purpose is the identification of terrorist and their planned
assaults. However, the Machine detects future violent acts of all kinds,
not just terrorism. Unknown to Finch, his partner, Nathan Ingram,
installed a routine called "Contingency" prior to delivering the system
to the government. The covert software causes the machine to also act on
non-terrorist crime. Finch is appalled that Ingram has the data sent
directly to him. After Finch fails to prevent Ingram's
computer-predicted murder, he further modifies the system so that
"irrelevant" non-terrorism data is transmitted to him in the form of
social security numbers, via coded messages over a public telephone.
Over the course of each episode, the viewer periodically sees events as
a Machine-generated on-screen display of data about a character or
characters: identification, activities, records, and more may be
displayed. The viewer also sees a Machine-generated perspective as it
monitors New York. Commercial flights are outlined by green triangles,
red concentric circles indicate no-fly zones around tall buildings, and
dashed boxes mark individual people. The Machine classifies the people
it watches by color-coding the boxes: white for no threat or an
irrelevant threat; red for perceived threats to the Machine,
red-and-white for individuals predicted to be violent; and yellow for
people who know about the machine, including Finch, Reese, Ingram,
Corwin and Root. The white-boxed "irrelevant threat" targets include the
Persons of Interest that Reese and Finch assist.
As the series progressed, a wider governmental conspiracy emerged. Known
as "The Program", it revolves around the development and utilization of
the Machine. Apparently led by a mysterious figure known only as
"Control", an unnamed official (Jay O. Sanders) from the Office of
Special Counsel begins eliminating key personnel who are aware of the
Machine's existence by deploying teams of Intelligence Support Activity
(ISA) operatives who believe they are acting to eliminate perceived
terrorist threats on the recommendation of a department known as
"Research". The members of the elimination teams are classified by the
Machine using a blue box.
Person's producers have hinted the third season of the hit
series, which moves to a new day and slot (Tuesdays at 10 pm, premiering
on September 24) will attempt to be more, er, science fiction-y. Like
all television shows, Person does have some reality-bending
elements, but the suspension of disbelief level required is remarkably
low. The bad guys are still lousy shots, and the key characters make
miraculous recoveries from concussions, lethal injections and various
forms of physical trauma, often before the show's end credits roll. But
hey, it's episodic broadcast television, right?
Where the show excels is in production values and technical accuracy.
While Mr. Finch's technology boasts features which are a couple software
releases in the future, the indulgences can be forgiven. The show's
cellular phone networks, computers, and other devices work at blinding
speed. But when you have to shoehorn a rich narrative into 40 minutes of
actual episode time, you really don't want to watch systems execute
communication protocol negotiations in real time; trust me.
Particularly impressive is the effort the show puts into elements that
have perhaps a second or two of screen time. Thanks to high definition
and digital video recording, I've been able to freeze frame some of the
monitor shots- and it's obvious these guys have some real-world Unix and
TCP/IP knowledge. A one-second blip of a phony newspaper article reveals
someone actually wrote a faux news story and, apparently, follows The
AP Stylebook.
Other one-hour drama series spend eight days or less to film an episode. Person
of Interest spends nine and a half, with more camera coverage,
extensive location shooting, and substantial post-production work.
They spend money on this show, and it's all up on the screen. The
episodes have a decided theatrical motion picture feel.
So... when planning your television viewing for the upcoming season,
give Person a shot. Like certain other Warner Brothers shows, the
studio hasn't made it available for free, on-demand viewing- you have to
buy the DVDs or download the show from iTunes. Update: During the
third season, the show became available on the CBS website.
Just type CBS Person of Interest into Google and you'll find hundreds of
useful fan sites and video clips from key episodes.
One caveat- the series is produced by J.J. Abrams of Lost fame,
which means there's a chance that at some point the whole thing could
take a sharp turn into stupidity. But, based on the first two seasons,
it's worth the risk.
I never paid much attention to the insurance policy on my cell phone.
But recent events make me wonder whether I'm adequately covered:
This insurance does not apply to loss or damage caused directly or
indirectly by any of the following: a. Governmental Authority Seizure
or destruction of property by order of governmental authority. b.
Nuclear Hazard Nuclear reaction or radiation , or radioactive
contamination, however caused. If physical loss or damage by fire
ensues, we will pay only for such ensuing loss or damage.
What's the difference between a nuclear holocaust that melts your phone
instead of causing it to burst into flame? And who's going to be around
to process the claim?
c. War (1) War, including undeclared or civil war; (2) Warlike
action by a military force; or (3) Insurrection, rebellion,
revolution, usurped power or action taken by governmental authority in
hindering or defending against any of these.
Technically, the United States hasn't been in a declared war since World
War II, so this is a bit fuzzy. Who, precisely, determines what's a
"warlike action by a military force?" As for "insurrection," etc., does
that mean if someone steps on my phone at a Tea Party or ACLU rally that
I'm out of luck?
Then there's this:
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO POLICYHOLDERS- TERRORISM RISK
INSURANCE ACT OF 2002
You are hereby notified that, under
the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended, we must make
terrorism coverage available if your policy covers commercial property.
However, the actual coverage provided by your policy for acts of
terrorism, as is true for all coverages, is limited by the terms,
conditions, exclusions, limits, other provision of your policy, any
endorsements to the policy and generally applicable rules of law. Any
terrorism coverage provided by this policy may be partially reimbursed
by the United States Government under a formula established by Federal
Law. If applicable, under this formula, the United States Government
will pay 85% of covered terrorism losses exceeding a statutorily
established deductible paid by insurers until such time as insured
losses reach the $100 billion cap that limits U.S. Government
reimbursement as well as insurers' liability for losses. If that occurs,
your coverage may be reduced. You will not be required to pay a premium
for terrorism coverage at this time. If a premium is going to be charged
for terrorism coverage, we will provide you with advance notification of
what that premium will be.
Oh, what the hell. The cellular network will have collapsed, anyway.
Democratic nations must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the
hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend. -Margaret
Thatcher
Fighting terrorism is like being a goalkeeper. You can make a hundred
brilliant saves but the only shot that people remember is the one that
gets past you. -Paul Wilkinson
I figure if I don't have that third martini, then the terrorists win. -J.C.
Duffy (New Yorker cartoon caption)
If we like them, they're freedom fighters... If we don't like them,
they're terrorists. In the unlikely case we can't make up our minds,
they're temporarily only guerrillas. -Carl Sagan
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices. -Edward
R. Murrow
Remember the axiom: the danger of terrorism lies not in what it inflicts
but in what it provokes. -Martin Amis
Terrorism is the tactic of demanding the impossible, and demanding it at
gunpoint. -Christopher Hitchens
Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich. -Peter
Ustinov
Terrorism is what we call the violence of the weak, and we condemn it;
war is what we call the violence of the strong, and we glorify it. -Sydney
J. Harris
Terrorists is what the little army calls the big army. -Unattributed
(Bumper Sticker)
The terrorist lives for terror, not for the change he tells himself he
wants. He masks his desire to kill and destroy behind the curtain of a
cause. -Louis L'Amour
There is no inverse relationship between freedom and security. Less of
one does not lead to more of the other. People with no rights are not
safe from terrorist attack. -Molly Ivins
They don't want to live; they want you to die. -Ayn Rand (re:
terrorists)
When homophobia trumps terrorism as an issue... wow. This country needs
to get laid. -Bill Maher
One of 52,042
quotations
from the KGB Quotations Database, selected by
Random Text.
Click here to search
for words, authors or phrases. Search page design and software contributed by Rafal Sulejman.
Current weather from my backyard in South Park, PA.